Marcus was the most liked person on the leadership team, and it wasn’t close.
He remembered people’s kids’ names. He gave credit away. In eleven years nobody had heard him raise his voice or throw anyone under a bus. If you had asked his team whether they trusted him, every one of them would have said yes without pausing.
Then the recall happened.
(A composite. The pattern is real; the company isn’t.)
Within about four days, Marcus noticed something he could not explain. Decisions were being made in rooms he wasn’t in. His own directs were looping in Priya from Quality — competent, blunt, not especially warm — on calls that were squarely his.
Nobody had decided to cut him out. It just kept happening.
Three kinds of trust, not one
Most leaders think of trust as a single quantity you either have or don’t. It’s three.
Personal — do they trust you, as a human being? Ethical — do they trust you to do the right thing when it costs something? Situational — do they trust you to handle this specific situation competently?
Marcus was near the top on the first two and had never once been tested on the third. Eleven calm years had given him no opportunity to demonstrate that he could run something frightening.
So when something frightening arrived, his team did what teams do: they went to the person they had seen handle pressure before. That was Priya, because two years earlier she had run a supplier failure and been visibly steady in it.
That wasn’t disloyalty. It was pattern-matching, and it was accurate.
The uncomfortable part
You can be beloved and still not be trusted to run the crisis. You can be brilliant and still not be trusted with the truth. The three dimensions do not substitute for each other, and the one you’re weakest on is almost never the one you’d guess — because you don’t get tested on it often, which is exactly why it stayed weak.
Marcus’s mistake wasn’t the recall. It was assuming that eleven years of goodwill had been building all three at once. It had been building two, generously, and the third not at all.
What he did about it
He stopped trying to win the room back and asked Priya to co-lead the response with him, out loud, in front of everyone.
That looks like weakness for about a week. What it actually did was two things: it got the response run by someone who had done it before, and it let his team watch him work a crisis at close range — which is the only way situational trust ever gets built.
The next one, eight months later, he ran himself. Nobody routed around him.
Where to start this week
Score yourself on all three, separately. Personal, ethical, situational. Be honest about which one has never really been tested.
Find out where your team actually goes. When something urgent breaks, who gets called first? If it isn’t you, that is information, not an insult.
Borrow credibility before you need it. Pairing yourself with someone who has the dimension you lack is not an admission of failure. It’s the fastest way to build the thing you’re missing.
More on this is in Chapter 1 — Trust Is the Cornerstone of Firm Foundations. See also Trust Is the Cornerstone.
Working on this with a real team and want a second set of eyes? Start a conversation, or book a 30-minute call. No pitch — just a look at what you are actually dealing with.
Leave a Reply